Bitcoin – Time to get real

5 mins. to read
Bitcoin – Time to get real

After a stunning rise in recent months, Bill Blain says it’s time to “get real” about the long-term prospects for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

The current uncertainty encompassing markets, politics, government pandemic spending programmes, and central bank QE very much suits proponents of Bitcoin. Febrile markets mean Bitcoin is on a roll – but it’s just another of its periodic flirtations with the financially credulous who have driven the price up 65% since September to $18,300.

After watching it for years, I confidently expect Bitcoin will soar higher, attracting more and more cash from buyers who “understand it” and then it will, predictably, crash again. In the meantime, there will be a lot of noise and a lot of social media fake-news about how people got spectacularly rich. At the end the “Greater Fools” will be left holding Bitcoin, watching the value plummet before discovering their digital wallet got hacked and is empty.

We have been here before.

Recently, the Financial Times asked some questions about the recurring crisis on crypto-exchanges and coin-wallets. Still, they concluded Bitcoin is a maturing asset class. It quoted a billionaire hedge fund manager calling it an inflation hedge with great intellectual capital behind it.  


I understand what Bitcoin is very well. It pretends to be more than money (money and exchangeability combined as one), but it isn’t. It’s not real like gold, it’s not guaranteed like real money. It’s something else… clever and possibly malign. 

Its only credential is the number of other people who believe in it. Its ability to be an instantly transferred store of value and unit of account relies on everyone who bought into it, or smells the opportunity around it, continues to suspend any disbelief and accepts the intangible Bitcoin is a real thing. To everyone else… it makes limited sense to replace gold or money with something so intangible – they probably remember the story of the Emperor’s New Clothes.

And that’s the issue: there are those of us who see no real need for such a notional asset, and there are those who see great opportunities for personal enrichment by convincing people there is greater utility and wealth prospect from Bitcoin than in fiat money or gold. So they talk up Bitcoin and convince us gold is worth nothing (that 5,000 years of history has been overturned), and currencies are just an enormous scam governments are using to control us.

The supporters of Bitcoin fall into three camps (which I will describe below). Everyone else is being pulled along for the ride. Forget whatever guff you read about how Bitcoin will change the world, how it opens new windows on financial innovation, or how it is a safe store of value when governments are destroying trust in money – put it aside. Ignore such nonsense – this is all part of the insidious narrative Bitcoin sponsors further their cons and get-rich-quick schemes upon.

Approach everything you read or hear on Bitcoin with great suspicion. All the proponents of Bitcoin have one common objective: to establish a wider veneer of credibility to attract in the next ‘greater fool’.

The first group referred to above are criminals. Bitcoin is the perfect untraceable token and transfer mechanism in the netherworld of the Dark Web and Silk Roads. Its anonymity makes it the preferred medium for any kind of cybercrime. You don’t have to believe in the concept or understand the complexities of distributed ledgers to accept it’s the preferred way for the underworld and shadow economy to transact. Untraceable, easy to launder, easy to transfer money – it’s the dream asset for the shadow economy.

The second group are the social theorists with a grudge. If you argue about Bitcoin very quickly the libertarians will emerge, pounding on about how Bitcoin is immune to the vague and imagined dangers of government spending creating inflation, how it’s fighting communism and the dangers of socialist money creation. It’s the antidote to the inherent evil they perceive in government monopolies on money. Bitcoin has become a poster-child for the Libertarian Right’s war on “big” government.

And the third group are the public who’ve bought Bitcoin. They crave reinforcement and praise for their financial acumen. They don’t particularly need to understand the tech or the social aspects of Bitcoin. They just want to see it rise higher and higher – and you will meet them in all kinds of social situations bragging about how much they’ve made. Their “follow-the-leader” success is compelling – yesterday a number of my colleagues were letting their sceptical barriers down, suggesting; “well, maybe I will put just one percent of my assets into Bitcoin…” That’s dangerous… scepticism will turn into belief.

Money works because it is accepted. All three groups want to see Bitcoin gain credibility which means wider acceptance. Wider acceptance means greater demand, which explains why a Citicorp analyst was on the wires this week predicting it will hit $318,000 in 2021. Greater adoption by users will inflate the value of the scarce asset. My simple maths says the demand for Bitcoin would have to astronomically increase – being accepted as a credible medium of exchange by at around 20 times more people than currently believe. 

All the Bitcoin hacks are on the wires saying the fact that Paypal now accepts Bitcoin is a “tremendous” step in increased adoption and will boost Bitcoin further. Remember, aside from the dark web, everything you can buy with a bitcoin, you can already buy with a dollar.

I understand how distributed ledgers work, the opportunities and disruptions likely to arise across the financial markets from the perfected transfer of digital money, and the point of a digital currency for our digital age. I’m pretty sure we’ll be getting proper digital currencies from the traditional providers of monetary stock.

I’m pretty sure unregulated crypto-currencies have a limited shelf life. Governments are unlikely to ever willingly surrender their monopolies on printing and digitising money. Someone will be the greatest fool when they are regulated out of existence. 

I also understand the lustre of gold, and that makes far more sense to me than something that requires enormous amounts of power to run unfeasibly complex computer programmes to create an invisible unit of account I don’t believe in. 

At the end of the day… Bitcoin is money to those that believe it is money. Maybe they believe in fairies as well. Be very suspicious of the Bitcoin parasites and ticks trying to persuade you it’s better than fiat currency or gold. It’s not. At best it’s niche for the seedier parts of the market…

Or think about it this way: 

Imagine a man offered to sell you a handful of invisible money for $100. You laugh. The next day he offers to sell you a handful of invisible money for $200. You say “really”. On the third day he offers to sell you a handful of invisible money for $300… and you buy because that’s the market price?

Get real.

Comments (3)

  • James says:

    So much pompous hyperbole in this article. The author writes with an authoritative tone about a subject they seemingly know very little. Here’s one such gem:

    “The first group referred to above are criminals. Bitcoin is the perfect untraceable token and transfer mechanism in the netherworld of the Dark Web and Silk Roads. Its anonymity makes it the preferred medium for any kind of cybercrime.”

    Complete BS. Bitcoin is a pseudononymous asset that is 100% traceable and only anonymous insofar as you’re able to obtain it via cash. Most reputable exchanges inflict KYC/AML checks on those they onboard, so when combined with the traceability, there is no anonymity for those who use it in this way.

    “Recently, the Financial Times asked some questions about the recurring crisis on crypto-exchanges and coin-wallets”

    What crisis? Please enlighten us oh wise one…? Those of us who own BTC in non-custodial wallets are not exposed to any hacks or thefts from exchanges. No non-custodial wallet has ever been hacked. Period.

    I say the above as somebody who holds shiny metal and BTC. All the arguments you apply pertaining to how Governments will stamp out the latter apply equally to the former; particularly if Central Banks do go down the route of smart contract-enforced blockchain-based digital currency. This would allow them to enforce a ban on any CDBC transaction involving Gold, aswell as Bitcoin.

    Capital will flow to any jurisdiction that treats it well, so I’d expect both Gold and Bitcoin to flow this way over time. At least with the latter one won’t need to stuff it up their rectum to move it across National borders…

  • Paul says:

    For something that does not exist…… Bitcon uses as much electric as the Czech republic
    That is before any mass adoption……….Great would not like that

    Just like my trading platform has just this week……cancelled Crypto CFDs, it could be cancelled over the weekend

    Turn again Dick Whittington the streets of London are paved with GOLD

  • Victor Janulaitis says:

    We live at an age of Scams -any Scam, most of which follow the traditional objective of relieving us of cash and in far too many cases of substantial savings which have taken some pensioners a life time to assemble.
    Thank you Bill Blain for your forthright verdict, which should be taken as a warning. Although I always saw Crypto Currency as an empty promise, I am always taken aback by the levels of naivety among the general public, although after watching the vast numbers attached to remaining in the EU, nothing should surprise us! Many people will often be fooled by minor scams, but when these extend to major issues it is essential that someone should raise the alarm.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *